Phase III Comparison of Thoracic Radiotherapy Regimens in Patients with Limited Small Cell Lung Cancer Also Receiving Cisplatin and Etoposide. Open. Download Table | Schema for CALGB trial CALGB trial schema from publication: Small Cell Lung Cancer: Have We Made Any Progress Over the . This randomized phase III trial is comparing three different chest radiation therapy regimens to see how well they work in treating patients with limited-stage .

Author: Tygozuru Bajora
Country: Georgia
Language: English (Spanish)
Genre: History
Published (Last): 4 January 2012
Pages: 274
PDF File Size: 20.2 Mb
ePub File Size: 1.46 Mb
ISBN: 789-4-91191-951-4
Downloads: 12055
Price: Free* [*Free Regsitration Required]
Uploader: Faudal

Radiation-related toxicities were lower than expected likely due to the use of modern RT techniques These inconclusive results suggest that either schedule can be used in this setting. High-dose radiation therapy to the lungs and esophagus in the once-daily arm did not seem to translate to a significant difference between the arms in terms of esophagitis or pneumonitis.

Comparison of once and twice daily radiotherapy for limited stage small-cell lung cancer.

Clinical Applications of Genomic Studies R. Seidman, MD, and Charles E. There was one death in the twice-daily group and two in the once-daily group due to radiation pneumonitis.


Formal discussant Taofeek Kunle Owonikoko, MDof Winship Cancer Institute of Emory University, Atlanta, said it has been controversial whether to use once-daily or twice-daily radiation therapy in this patient population. No statistically significant differences between the two groups were reported for the rates of progression-free survival or local or metastatic disease progression.

In this trial, survival was higher than previously reported in other trials of this patient population, and radiation toxicities were lower than expected.

Survival in both arms was higher than previously reported. Median overall survival was 30 months vs 25 months, a difference that is not statistically significant.

Comparison of once and twice daily radiotherapy for limited stage small-cell lung cancer.

By Alice Goodman June 25, Advertisement. There was no statistically significant overall survival difference between the groups.

Taofeek Kunle Owonikoko, MD. Patients with any response were offered prophylactic cranial radiation therapy. Updated Trial Findings View More. Eighty percent of patients had stage III disease.


All analyses were done on an intention-to-treat basis. It was challenging to accrue patients with this disease.

The study enrolled patients with histologically or cytologically proven SCLC recruited from 73 centers in 7 European countries and Canada between and Expert Point of View: Adverse events were not significantly different between the two groups as well, with the exception of more neutropenia in patients treated with twice-daily radiation therapy.

It evaluated the optimization of chemoradiotherapy in limited-stage SCLC. An international randomised trial of concurrent chemo-radiotherapy comparing twice-daily and once-daily radiotherapy schedules in patients aclgb limited stage small cell lung cancer and good performance status. A total of 25 patients 30601 the twice-daily radiation therapy group and 32 in the once-daily radiation therapy group did not get concurrent chemoradiation therapy.